Apparently, some secularists have attempted to write their own alternative version of the Ten Commandments. These attempts to improve on Gods' revelations never go well. This set of suggestions (they are hardly commandments) are not an exception.
Mike Flynn and
William M. Briggs each perform an autopsy. From Mr. Flynn's post:
One senses throughout the article that particular love of theory that is the root of all evil.
Unlike the original Commandments, there is a steady whiff not of
practicality but of theoretical bromides and academic huff-and-puffery
that sound very kool until examined more closely.
It is not clear which of the original ten commandments they find
objectionable. Even the commandment to avoid false gods is applied
relative to things like White Race, the Almighty Dollar, the Fatherland,
and other modern deities. And the commandment against false oaths is
presumably acceptable as long as one does not believe they will be
caught at it by an all-knowing deity. Otherwise, the court system
collapses. Besides, we are all aware of the many words and phrases that
Must Not Be Uttered in these, our modern times. Only the staunchest
capitalist will demand that people work seven days a week.
So perhaps they object to honoring their father and their mother.
Secularists are these days desperate to retain morality without God. Perhaps they have realized that some sort of morality, some ethics, is necessary for society to function. They are not anarchists as much anymore, but they cannot quite bring themselves to accept the rule of God. As Chesterton said,
Now who that runs can read it,The riddle that I write,Of why this poor old sinner,Should sin without delight-But I, I cannot read it(Although I run and run),Of them that do not have the faith,And will not have the fun.
No comments:
Post a Comment